Animal testing is morally wrong

Why it is morally offensive The different types of animal testing and why they are morally wrong Animal testing is cruel and an inhumane way to torture animals for mankinds own benefit. There have been millions of animals that have suffered a vicious, painful death in the name of research. Just as Peter Singer asked in his book Animal Liberation Would experimenters be prepared to carry out their experiment on a human orphan under six months old if that were the only way to save thousands of lives?

Animal testing is morally wrong

The need to find cures for diseases and to ensure that products are safe for human use is of the first importance. Where we differ is about the means, not the ends. I hope that on this world day for laboratory animals we can also agree that vivisection necessarily entails a great deal of suffering - not every experiment, but very many.

In two out of three, no anaesthetic is used at any stage. Housing is often hopelessly inadequate. It is about mankind wanting to transfer its suffering on to other sentient animals. We do so without their consent and in the knowledge that they will not benefit at all from the process.

It is a classic case of gross exploitation by the strong of the weak for the exclusive benefit of the strong - the very thing we condemn in all other areas of human endeavour.

I would be interested to hear why you think vivisection is an exception to this ethical norm. And I applaud your public acknowledgement of the part that animal experimentation has played in those endeavours. But we can agree on much more: Most are on rats and mice, and almost three times as many rodents are destroyed as vermin.

Two-thirds of experiments are so mild that it would increase stress to give anaesthetics. If your mother or child lay dying would you condemn an animal experiment that might save them? Yours sincerely, Colin Dear Colin I did not, in fact, "publicly acknowledge" the efficacy of animal experiments, about which there is a real scientific debate.

Look at the long list of animal-tested drugs which have caused havoc when applied to humans. You raise the old chestnut about "your child or a dog".

You must know that that is a crude parody of vivisection, which involves the use of millions of animals with no more than the mere possibility of finding clues about diseases. Of course, if I really had to choose between my child and a dog, I would choose my child. But then if I had to choose between my child and you, I would again choose my child.

Could I therefore experiment on you? In other words, even if one accepts the subjective premise that humans are more important than animals, why does that mean we can deliberately cause them suffering?

Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing

That is the jump that pro-vivisectionists never explain. As for veterinary research, if experimenting on, say, a horse is justified so that horses as a species can benefit, presumably you believe that experimenting on a person is justified so that we can all benefit?

If not, why not? Yes, finding cures is of the first importance, but that does not mean that anything goes. Remember, this century has seen several examples of experiments on humans to find cures for diseases.

Animal testing is morally wrong

No one would justify those means just because the end is desired.Animal testing is not only unfair to the animals, it is also unfair to those humans who are forced to perform the tests. PETA reported that students who test on animals are mentally scarred and sometimes leave the science field as a result.

BBC - Ethics - Animal ethics: Experimenting on animals

The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. Animal testing is a morally debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong.

This paper will present both sides of this issue as well as my own opinion. Human animals created moral codes because most of us believe that enslaving, raping, torturing and murdering other humans is wrong. "Normal" adult human animals are moral agents, while nonhuman animals, infant humans, and severely mentally challenged humans (among others) are moral patients.

Animal testing is an experimentation performed on animals. Scientists test on animals to assess the safety and effectiveness a product is, this can be anything from medication, pesticides, industrial chemicals, food additives, household products, supplements, and cosmetics.

Animal testing is morally. However, there is an ongoing debate about the ethics of animal experimentation. Some people argue that all animal experimentation should end because it is wrong .

Animal testing is an experimentation performed on animals. Scientists test on animals to assess the safety and effectiveness a product is, this can be anything from medication, pesticides, industrial chemicals, food additives, household products, supplements, and cosmetics.

Animal Testing - Why it is Morally Wrong by Ainsley Peter on Prezi